COST AND RETURNS OF SCHOOL-BASED TEACHER DEVELOPMENT: PERSPECTIVES OF STAKEHOLDERS IN SOKOTO SOUTH EDUCATION ZONE, NIGERIA
Keywords:
Continuing Professional Development, Phenomenology, Qualitative Research, School-Based Teacher DevelopmentAbstract
This study examined the cost and returns of SBTD programmes. It was a Qualitative design of descriptive Phenomenology type. The population comprised 27 principals and 1,085 teachers across 27 senior secondary schools in Sokoto South Education Zone. However, Purposive sampling technique was used to sample five (5) principals and twenty (20) teachers. The limited sample size is justified by qualitative research standards where depth of insight is prioritized over breadth. Data was collected using a validated Stakeholders Perspectives In-depth Interview Guide (SPIDIG) and member-checking method used to ensure reliability. Thematic analysis involving transcription, coding and theme development guides data analysis. One of the findings of the study was that, cost of organizing SBTD was modest and manageable, usually around ?20,000 to ?30,000, which is part of the normal school running cost. The study therefore concluded that, formalizing SBTD as alternative teachers’ continuing professional development can provide more in-service training opportunities for teachers. Thus, it was among other things recommended that, Sokoto state Ministry for Basic and Secondary education should formally adopt and encourage schools to organize SBTD.
DOI: https://doie.org/10.10318/SER.2026442154
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 SIRAJO ALHAJI LADAN , SAMAILA BELLO

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Author(s) retain the copyright for their articles published in Sokoto Educational Review, with first publication rights granted to the journal. By virtue of their appearance in this open access journal, articles are free to use with proper attribution in educational and other non-commercial sectors.
Author(s) confirm that the work does not infringe any personal or property rights of another, that the work does not contain anything libellous or otherwise illegal.
Author(s) also agree that the work contains no material from other works protected by copyright that have been used without the written consent of the copyright owner.